Item Upon
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Communications > VOIP > Security Checklist For Voip Service Providers

Tags

  • against
  • borrower
  • client
  • logic attack
  • exploitsip flood
  • client devices

  • Links

  • How to Forgive and Move On (Part 2)
  • Designing with Hardwood Floors Made Easier
  • Marketing Your Art though Art Shows and Festivals
  • Item Upon - Security Checklist For Voip Service Providers

    Preparing for Submitting a Mortgage Application
    If you are buying a home, you are going to need a home loan. So, what steps do you need to take before submitting your mortgage application?Preparing for Submitting a Mortgage ApplicationAt first glance, you may think a mortgage is simply a loan of money in exchange for a promise to pay. While this is true, another perspective is that a mortgage is a hedged bet. The mortgage lender is trying to determine what type of a risk you are, to wit, what is the likelihood you will repay the loan? The hedge, of course, is the fact the lender can take and resell your home if you default on the loan, but lenders do not like to do this. They are in the business of loaning money, not selling homes.The number one thing you are going to need is documentation. The lender i
    ETF SIP Torture test developed through the SIPiT Events or the PROTOS Test-Suite, developed by the University of Oulu.

    A more sophisticated attack can be to inject messages into a call to terminate it prematurely. This type of attack can be largely avoided by the use of strong authentication techniques, thus, the injected packet would not be authenticated and therefore would be rejected.

    SIP Flood Attacks

    SIP flood attacks exploit weaknesses higher up the communications stack that require more processing resources. As a consequence, it takes a much smaller flood to cause disruption.

    Internet Tales and Tips
    You know, going down the Internet marketing trail the way I have...and approaching the Internet from an SEO perspective, I am able to observe how the net works and more importantly, how the programs that are designed for success for average people like me work.Funny thing, most people just know that they need to buy some software program, some Internet marketing marvel, some latest and greatest program that will automatically make them highly successful and rich.Programs that can range from $19.95 to thousands of dollars are being sold every single day to people with stars in their eyes hungry for the grand prize of Internet marketing success. This is not to say that some programs are good.Some programs actually do assist people in building an online busin
    It is often said that understanding the problem is 90% of the solution, and VoIP security is no exception. It is fear of the unknown which is likely to elicit a knee-jerk reaction of panic, so the first step is to understand the threats and then classify them. We also have to ask the question: what does security mean to me and what does it mean to my customers?

    Security to the customer means protecting their device and identity and the continuity of their service. Security to the service provider means protecting their network their revenue and their customers. In this feature we will look at service disruption and service theft.

    Disruption

    A service can be disrupted by breaking the user's device, flooding the IP network with traffic or breaking the service provider's infrastructure. Disruption is usually achieved through either Logic Attacks or Flood Attacks or Application Layer Attacks.

    • Logic attacks exploit vulnerabilities in protocols or their implementations, e.g. Ping of death, Teardrop, Land etc.

    • Flood attacks disable targets through traffic volume; a flood attack can originate from a single platform or from multiple platforms.

    • Application Layer Attacks include: SIP-SPAM, and identity forging.

    We can also divide the attacks into IP layer and SIP layer thus:

    IP Logic Attack / IP Flood Attack
    SIP Logic Attack / SIP Flood Attack
    Application Layer attack

    IP Logic Attacks

    IP Logic attacks on SIP devices are no different to any other IP device; these include well known exploits such as: Ping of death, Teardrop, Land, Chargen and Out of sequence packets. All of these can disable a device which has not been fully tested to protect itself against these exploits.

    IP Flood Attacks

    IP Flood attacks include: SYN flood attack (TCP SYN Floods are one of the oldest DoS attacks in existence), Smurf Attack, Fraggle attack and the list goes on... These attacks are designed either to overcome the device by tying up resources or to simply overwhelm the network through shear weight of traffic.

    SIP Logic Attacks

    SIP logic attacks exploit weaknesses in SIP signalling implementations. Incomplete or incorrect fields, invalid message types can disable not only client devices but also core network devices. This type of attack can be countered by thorough testing of any devices against suites such at the IETF SIP Torture test developed through the SIPiT Events or the PROTOS Test-Suite, developed by the University of Oulu.

    A more sophisticated attack can be to inject messages into a call to terminate it prematurely. This type of attack can be largely avoided by the use of strong authentication techniques, thus, the injected packet would not be authenticated and therefore would be rejected.

    SIP Flood Attacks

    SIP flood attacks exploit weaknesses higher up the communications stack that require more processing resources. As a consequence, it takes a much smaller flood to cause disruption.

    Residential Real Estate Loans
    A residential area is land where the predominant use is residential. In areas that are residentially zoned, buildings may include single family housing, multiple family housing or mobile homes. Zoning for residential use may permit some services or work opportunities or may totally exclude all business and industry. To purchase a residential space involves large funds. Not all are capable of procuring these amounts. In such scenarios, people prefer to borrow the money from banks, financial institution or brokers, in the form of a loan.A loan is form of debt. Like all debt instruments, a loan entails the redistribution of financial assets over time, between the lender and the borrower. The borrower initially receives an amount from the lender, which is paid back, usually
    disruption and service theft.

    Disruption

    A service can be disrupted by breaking the user's device, flooding the IP network with traffic or breaking the service provider's infrastructure. Disruption is usually achieved through either Logic Attacks or Flood Attacks or Application Layer Attacks.

    • Logic attacks exploit vulnerabilities in protocols or their implementations, e.g. Ping of death, Teardrop, Land etc.

    • Flood attacks disable targets through traffic volume; a flood attack can originate from a single platform or from multiple platforms.

    • Application Layer Attacks include: SIP-SPAM, and identity forging.

    We can also divide the attacks into IP layer and SIP layer thus:

    IP Logic Attack / IP Flood Attack
    SIP Logic Attack / SIP Flood Attack
    Application Layer attack

    IP Logic Attacks

    IP Logic attacks on SIP devices are no different to any other IP device; these include well known exploits such as: Ping of death, Teardrop, Land, Chargen and Out of sequence packets. All of these can disable a device which has not been fully tested to protect itself against these exploits.

    IP Flood Attacks

    IP Flood attacks include: SYN flood attack (TCP SYN Floods are one of the oldest DoS attacks in existence), Smurf Attack, Fraggle attack and the list goes on... These attacks are designed either to overcome the device by tying up resources or to simply overwhelm the network through shear weight of traffic.

    SIP Logic Attacks

    SIP logic attacks exploit weaknesses in SIP signalling implementations. Incomplete or incorrect fields, invalid message types can disable not only client devices but also core network devices. This type of attack can be countered by thorough testing of any devices against suites such at the IETF SIP Torture test developed through the SIPiT Events or the PROTOS Test-Suite, developed by the University of Oulu.

    A more sophisticated attack can be to inject messages into a call to terminate it prematurely. This type of attack can be largely avoided by the use of strong authentication techniques, thus, the injected packet would not be authenticated and therefore would be rejected.

    SIP Flood Attacks

    SIP flood attacks exploit weaknesses higher up the communications stack that require more processing resources. As a consequence, it takes a much smaller flood to cause disruption.

    Where to Start?
    That's the question you may be asking yourself today as you venture into a new partnership, a new marketing campaign, a new web site, starting your list or any of the other new things you may be starting for you online business. Maybe you've started a similar project before so you have some experience and you know what you're going to do. Maybe you've never done this type of thing before so you have to learn how. No matter what you're starting and no matter if you have experience or not, the 7 things you must do first are: Decide what you're going to start.Decide what the goal of the project is.Make a plan on how to reach your goal.Break each step of
    include: SIP-SPAM, and identity forging.

    We can also divide the attacks into IP layer and SIP layer thus:

    IP Logic Attack / IP Flood Attack
    SIP Logic Attack / SIP Flood Attack
    Application Layer attack

    IP Logic Attacks

    IP Logic attacks on SIP devices are no different to any other IP device; these include well known exploits such as: Ping of death, Teardrop, Land, Chargen and Out of sequence packets. All of these can disable a device which has not been fully tested to protect itself against these exploits.

    IP Flood Attacks

    IP Flood attacks include: SYN flood attack (TCP SYN Floods are one of the oldest DoS attacks in existence), Smurf Attack, Fraggle attack and the list goes on... These attacks are designed either to overcome the device by tying up resources or to simply overwhelm the network through shear weight of traffic.

    SIP Logic Attacks

    SIP logic attacks exploit weaknesses in SIP signalling implementations. Incomplete or incorrect fields, invalid message types can disable not only client devices but also core network devices. This type of attack can be countered by thorough testing of any devices against suites such at the IETF SIP Torture test developed through the SIPiT Events or the PROTOS Test-Suite, developed by the University of Oulu.

    A more sophisticated attack can be to inject messages into a call to terminate it prematurely. This type of attack can be largely avoided by the use of strong authentication techniques, thus, the injected packet would not be authenticated and therefore would be rejected.

    SIP Flood Attacks

    SIP flood attacks exploit weaknesses higher up the communications stack that require more processing resources. As a consequence, it takes a much smaller flood to cause disruption.

    Job Search: Age-Proofing Your Resume
    Older job hunters fear interviews where their age cannot be concealed and where an initial response of dismay on an interviewer's face, quickly hidden, confirms their anticipation of discrimination. The mature job seeker often prefers the anonymity of mailed resumes, e-mailed inquiries, internet applications, and telephone contacts.Interviews, however, are the goal of everyone who wants to work. There is so much pre-selection and screening before an interview is granted that simply getting that far in the process provides at least some expectation of an offer being made. It is when interviews are not forthcoming that real concern is needed. Ask yourself if you may be inadvertently triggering screening filters by the documentation you submit.Review the following t
    : SYN flood attack (TCP SYN Floods are one of the oldest DoS attacks in existence), Smurf Attack, Fraggle attack and the list goes on... These attacks are designed either to overcome the device by tying up resources or to simply overwhelm the network through shear weight of traffic.

    SIP Logic Attacks

    SIP logic attacks exploit weaknesses in SIP signalling implementations. Incomplete or incorrect fields, invalid message types can disable not only client devices but also core network devices. This type of attack can be countered by thorough testing of any devices against suites such at the IETF SIP Torture test developed through the SIPiT Events or the PROTOS Test-Suite, developed by the University of Oulu.

    A more sophisticated attack can be to inject messages into a call to terminate it prematurely. This type of attack can be largely avoided by the use of strong authentication techniques, thus, the injected packet would not be authenticated and therefore would be rejected.

    SIP Flood Attacks

    SIP flood attacks exploit weaknesses higher up the communications stack that require more processing resources. As a consequence, it takes a much smaller flood to cause disruption.

    Do You Have Multiple Sources Of Income?
    Are you happy with the fixed monthly salary you receive? Or are you happy with the kind of lifestyle you presently have? Perhaps answers to both the questions for most of us who have limited income will be ‘NO’. So why don’t we strive to multiply our source of income? It is possible and that also without much efforts. Instead of depending on one single source, we must find ways to develop multiple channels of income.Since most us are working and have less of time to spend on other activities, we can opt for any company that is based on Multi -level marketing business model. Working as an associate of these companies is much easier and economically beneficial. The process of working is simple and the best part is that even if you stop working after sometime, money
    ETF SIP Torture test developed through the SIPiT Events or the PROTOS Test-Suite, developed by the University of Oulu.

    A more sophisticated attack can be to inject messages into a call to terminate it prematurely. This type of attack can be largely avoided by the use of strong authentication techniques, thus, the injected packet would not be authenticated and therefore would be rejected.

    SIP Flood Attacks

    SIP flood attacks exploit weaknesses higher up the communications stack that require more processing resources. As a consequence, it takes a much smaller flood to cause disruption. For example, one or more devices may send multiple registrations or call requests to a server.

    Countering this type of disruption requires network based devices like Session Border Controllers (SBCs) to police the signalling stream and rate limit registrations and calls to Softswitches to predetermined limits. Acting as a proxy in the signalling stream the SBC can also filter inappropriate protocols, IP DoS attacks and invalid SIP messages. This helps compartmentalise the network and restricts any disruption to just one network segment.

    Protect the User Device

    These devices will typically be incapable of rate limiting and may be overrun by flood attacks. This means they are subject to both logic and flood attacks. Again the user device will benefit from the protection afforded by network based SBCs blocking DoS attacks and invalid SIP messages.

    Service Theft

    A simple example of service theft is to signal that a voice call it being made but exchange video data. This hits the service provider on two fronts: a) loss of revenue by billing for only a voice call and b) potential degradation in service quality for other users resulting in dissatisfaction.

    The structure of a VoIP call with separate media and signalling streams has lead to some innovative ploys. For example, a rogue PC client which transports media in the RTCP quality monitoring stream, this is not policed in most networks. Another ploy is to transport media in the call signalling then failing the call before billing commences. Not only does this mean a free call but repeated call set can cause huge signalling rates which are a DoS attack in themselves.

    The solution is to police all components of the call. SBCs police the signalling and the media to ensure that the call is executed as requested and that RTCP traffic is within expected bounds.

    Conclusion

    Security is a vast subject and needs to be ubiquitous in its implementation. Take care of the fundamentals first:

    Test, authenticate, protect, block, limit and police.

    • Test network elements against standard IP and SIP test suites to ensure they can survive IP and SIP logic attacks

    • Implement strong authentication, identifying your users protects their identity, protect their service and combats disruption.

    • Protect the Network by compartmentalizing it to restrict the range of any disruption.

    •

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.itemupon.com/article/186605/itemupon-Security-Checklist-For-Voip-Service-Providers.html">Security Checklist For Voip Service Providers</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.itemupon.com/article/186605/itemupon-Security-Checklist-For-Voip-Service-Providers.html]Security Checklist For Voip Service Providers[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Six Sigma Defined

    Small Business Loans - A Tool for Dream Starting a New Business

    Buying a New Apple Power Mac G5: A Smart Way to Get One

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com